Article: Intel® Pentium® D 950 Overclocking (Performance Dual Core For Everyone)
(N=Newbie, E=Hardware Enthusiast, O=Overclocker, B=Budget)
IV. Overclocking
Overclocking Goal
Before I overclock this processor, I already set a personal goal. Everytime I embark on
overclocking, I make it a point to jot down a realistic goal based on what I have so.
The reasoning is simple, it's always easy to lose track and get frustrated with overclocking
if the expectation is unreasonable. So for nitty gritty, below are the various goals that I
plan to achieve. I consider them neither conservative or agressive and within the boundaries
of the core of the CPU I am testing.
- Rock Stable (Either of the listed):
- Clock Frequency: 3.6GHz
- Front Side Bus: 210MHz (840MHz QPB)
- Suicide Shot (Either of the listed):
- Clock Frequency: 3.8GHz
- Front Side Bus: 220Hz
Rock Stable: is the state where the system works normaly without any glitch, passing 8hours of Prime95 with overnight loop of 3DMark01SE and can at least run all the other benchmarks used here once. There are two goals here, either of which is valid. It's to hit 3.6GHz on the clock frequency, this is basing on the Presler frequency being sold in the market with the same B1 stepping, labeled as Intel® Pentium® D 960 processor.
Suicide Shot: is the state where system can not work normally, and is alreay at the brink of crashing, where a slight opening of application can cause the system to full instability. This is important since I will only be using a stock fan, and stock voltage, the tweakers will have an idea of how much MHz the processor can still handle when given a proper cooling and voltage loving adjustment. Some may consider 3.8GHz is quite a bit low for a suicide shot, but since it's dual core and running at almost the highest speed available for the 900 series, it changes overclocking landscape a whole lot than just dealing with a single core. Chances are, the two cores might require a lot more voltage than what is necessary in the nominal settings.
A dual core it may be, it still overclock like single cores do! The superb overlocking stability that the Intel® D975XBX offered have ensured that I hit my target Rock Stable frequency very easily. Seeing as how I easily broke my goal, I decided to do a few tweaking here and there I manage to hit a 3.9GHz overclock. This overclock is purely on air, on stock voltage without any modification or magical changes on the BIOS except for those already mentioned. At this time, I have already decided to use my ever trusty Thermalright XP-90 with a silent 92mm Delta fan, since the temperature is rising too hot for my liking. I'd like to see how far I can push this on stock vCore. The CPU-Z speaks for itself already, and I am sure that with a voltage bump, it can reach high. As shown by IDU (Intel® Desktop Utility), the nominal voltage is just at a very low level of 1.27v!!!
All benchmarks ran without problems on this very high overclock, almost 1GHz overclock from stock settings. The processor is able to handle this speed for an overnight of benchmark galore, putting the strain of 100% load for over 10hours of torture testing. There was no throttling reported by the monitoring software. Temperature at idle hovers at 54C, while shoots to as high as 71c and the fan is still quiet. Unless there is a plan to use an aftermarket hsf for future CPU upgrade, I highly discourage getting a better fan than the stock fan. For the suicide shot, it took 300MHz more to make it really unstable that trying to get a screenshot is a challenge. I decided to get the next suicide shot at 4.4GHz which is also a good value, just to show how this baby can ran at on stock voltage, with an after-market heatsink fan.
Rock Stable: CPU-Z Validation
Suicide Shot: CPU-Z Validation
Intel® Pentium® D 950 3.4GHz/200MHz@4.25GHz/250MHz
PCMark02
PCMark04
PCMark05
Sandra-CPU
Sandra-Multimedia
Sandra-RAM Bandwidth
::3D Test::
3DMark01SE
3DMark03
3DMark05
With this processor, PCMark04's 5k barrier isn't a problem anymore and broke it without problems. Now comes the overclocking score, and lo and behold, 8k is broken, score is oozing smoothly. PCMark05 has improved as well and all other benchmark including Sandra has shown a definite huge. Another truly a Leap Ahead™ performance coming from Chipzilla who fuse and rated this processor at less than 4GHz but with which can really go beyond. This makes one think more about Chipzilla's fusing policy since this processor can definitely go higher, it only ensures that the rated speed will not degrade so easily if used overtime. The high ceiling and margin of performance can not be discounted.
In gaming, 3DMark01 shows results similar to the increase in performance shown by PCMark02. However, 3DMark03 and 3DMark05 didn't increase much since this is mostly GPU driven but still score increase is already noticeable.
